![]() ![]() I can tell you that both spend more time around 3.7 ish than 3, or 3.5 The 8 core’s turbo is identical to the 6 core’s. ![]() Even though 4 years and 2 months old, i still love those machines cause they are silent and have 6 thunderbolt 2 ports for tons of bus powered silent SSD’s. It’s the absolute sweet spot of the entire line up. I can tell you now, if you can spring for it, the 8 core is the one to get. They upgraded the speed of the onboard SSD, gave each model the next version up graphic card, and ditched the quad core. ![]() The trashcan had a silent speed bump so to speak in 2015 i think it was. ![]() Or I may just record everything with Cubase and then Mix with Logic. Darn…if anything I would probably be switching back to Logic X as I’m pretty sure that takes advantage of multiple cores better and I already own it. My latest thoughts were to get an 8 core because of this chart: Interesting…ok thanks for the heads up on that! Something to keep in mind! For Cubase, a higher clock speed seems to be more important. When I tested PT after upgrading from the 4-core to the 12-core, the difference was very noticeable…just not so on Cubase. However, Pro Tools was able to harness the power of the 12-core in a major way. There is some improvement for sure, but it wasn’t what I had hoped it would be. The 6-core seems to perform close to as well as the 12-core with Cubase, and neither were TOO much of an improvement over the 4-core, for me. Let me warn you: I upgraded my 4-core to a 12-core (can’t remember where, but there are specific videos online that show you how to do it), and there was not a majorly significant increase in power with Cubase, so I sold it and got a 6-core. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |